Growth Models with Time-Invariant Covariates

CenterStat June 20, 2017

Once an optimal model of linear or nonlinear change has been established, it is often of interest to try to predict individual differences in change over time. In this installment of our Office Hours series on growth modeling, Patrick discusses how to incorporate time-invariant covariates (TICS) into a growth model.

TICs are predictors that do not change as a function of time, for instance, biological sex, country of origin, birth order, or any person-level characteristic assessed only at the initial time point. TICs are used as predictors of the latent growth factors in the SEM or entered as Level 2 predictors of intercepts and slopes in the MLM; in both approaches, tests are obtained regarding the extent to which information on the TIC in part contributes to the growth process under study. Although the interpretation of predictors of the intercept factor are straightforward, predictors of the slope factor are more complex given the interaction between the predictor and time. These slope effects must be probed further to more fully understand the nature of the effect. Patrick discusses these issues in greater details and makes recommendations for using these in practice.

Bauer, D.J., & Curran, P.J. (2005). Probing interactions in fixed and multilevel regression: Inferential and graphical techniques. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 40, 373-400.

Curran, P. J., Bauer, D. J., & Willoughby, M. T. (2004). Testing main effects and interactions in latent curve analysis. Psychological Methods, 9, 220-237.

Preacher, K. J., Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interactions in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 437-448.

To see all episodes in this series, see our Growth Modeling playlist on YouTube.

Categories: Office Hours Videos

CenterStat

The Center for Statistical Training by Curran-Bauer Analytics provides livestream and on-demand workshops on advanced quantitative methods for researchers in the social, health, and behavioral sciences.

My advisor told me I should group-mean center my predictors in my multilevel model because it might “make my effects significant” but this doesn’t seem right to me. What exactly is involved in centering predictors within the multilevel model?

How to specify multilevel models to obtain within- and between-group effects through centering lower-level predictors.

Patrick Curran and Dan Bauer March 16, 2021

I fit a multilevel model and got the warning message “G Matrix is Non-Positive Definite.” What does this mean and what should I do about it?

Received the cryptic warning message “G matrix is non-positive definite”? Learn what this means and what to do about it.

Patrick Curran and Dan Bauer July 22, 2021

What exactly qualifies as intensive longitudinal data and why am I not able to use more traditional growth models to study stability and change over time?

This post considers the unique features of intensive longitudinal data (ILD) relative to other more traditional data structures and how we can appropriately analyze ILD given these features

Patrick Curran and Dan Bauer October 14, 2022

I’m reporting within- and between-group effects in from a multilevel model, and my reviewer says I need to address “sampling error” in the group means. What does this mean, and what can I do to address this?

Why between-group effects estimating in MLMs are sometimes biased, and what to do about it

Patrick Curran and Dan Bauer March 30, 2021

What’s the best way to determine the number of latent classes in a finite mixture analysis?

Selecting the number of classes (or components) is one of the most challenging decisions to make when fitting a finite mixture model (including latent class analysis and latent profile analysis). In this post, we talk through the conventional wisdom on class enumeration, as well as when this breaks down.

Patrick Curran and Dan Bauer November 11, 2021

Related Articles