Dan Bauer Receives Teaching Award from the American Psychological Association

CenterStat February 10, 2018

Curran-Bauer Analytics is pleased to announce that Dan has been honored with another teaching award in recognition of his exceptional teaching and mentoring skills. Dan was selected to receive the 2018 Jacob Cohen Award for Distinguished Teaching and Mentoring by the American Psychological Association, Division 5 (Quantitative and Qualitative Methods). He will be recognized at this year’s annual convention in San Francisco. This adds to several prior teaching awards granted to both Dan and Patrick. Dan also received the 2016 Distinguished Teaching Award for Post-Baccalaureate Instruction by the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and Patrick received both the 2016 Cohen Teaching Award from the APA and the 2012 Chapman Family Teaching Award from the University of North Carolina in recognition of excellence in undergraduate teaching. Dan and Patrick bring the same level of passion and commitment to teaching in their summer workshops, disseminating quantitative methods to a broad audience of researchers in the psychological, social, and health sciences.

Categories: Announcement

CenterStat

The Center for Statistical Training by Curran-Bauer Analytics provides livestream and on-demand workshops on advanced quantitative methods for researchers in the social, health, and behavioral sciences.

My advisor told me I should group-mean center my predictors in my multilevel model because it might “make my effects significant” but this doesn’t seem right to me. What exactly is involved in centering predictors within the multilevel model?

How to specify multilevel models to obtain within- and between-group effects through centering lower-level predictors.

Patrick Curran and Dan Bauer March 16, 2021

Congratulations to Patrick and Dan on Teaching Awards

Curran-Bauer Analytics is proud to announce that Patrick and Dan have both recently been selected to receive prestigious teaching awards: Patrick Curran has been selected…

CenterStat February 9, 2016

What exactly qualifies as intensive longitudinal data and why am I not able to use more traditional growth models to study stability and change over time?

This post considers the unique features of intensive longitudinal data (ILD) relative to other more traditional data structures and how we can appropriately analyze ILD given these features

Patrick Curran and Dan Bauer October 14, 2022

The Cronbach’s Alphas for all the scales in my path analysis are in the .7s, so why is a reviewer criticizing me for not paying sufficient attention to reliability?

The issue of reliability can be a complex and often misunderstood issue. Entire text books have been written about reliability, validity, and scale construction, so…

CenterStat December 21, 2019

I’m reporting within- and between-group effects in from a multilevel model, and my reviewer says I need to address “sampling error” in the group means. What does this mean, and what can I do to address this?

Why between-group effects estimating in MLMs are sometimes biased, and what to do about it

Patrick Curran and Dan Bauer March 30, 2021

Related Articles